
Paperis Articles
What a Stroke Actually Is — Blocked, Burst, and the Clock
A first-step guide for anyone who just got the phone call
Your field's papers, as audio
Pick your fields and journals — Paperis summarizes the key papers and turns them into audio. Listen on your commute.
Start Paperis free →What a Stroke Actually Is — Blocked, Burst, and the Clock
Chopsticks Drop at the Dinner Table
While eating dinner, chopsticks drop from one hand. Speech becomes slurred, and when asked to smile, only one corner of the mouth goes up. This is a person who was completely fine just minutes before. Family members usually call an ambulance without knowing what is happening, and only hear words they are hearing for the first time once they arrive at the hospital.
A stroke is a disease where blood going to the brain is suddenly blocked or bursts, damaging the brain that was receiving that blood. When blood going to the heart is blocked, heart muscle dies, and the same thing happens in the brain. The key is "suddenly." A person who was fine changes within a few minutes (PMID 38759664), and usually the person next to them notices first rather than the person themselves.
It is not a rare event either. In some high-income countries, as many as one in five people experience a stroke at least once in their lifetime, and in low-income countries, that proportion rises to nearly one in two. It is the second leading cause of death worldwide (PMID 38759664).
The brain stores almost none of the fuel and oxygen it uses, and receives what it needs through the blood on demand. Therefore, when the incoming blood falls below a certain line, the brain falls into a state where its energy is exhausted (PMID 39545332). It is estimated that for every minute that passes without treatment, about 1.8 million nerve cells vanish. This is where the saying "time is brain" comes from (PMID 25323674).
This article looks at four things in order: why strokes are divided into two types and why the two are handled differently, why what people lose differs from person to person, what hospitals do, and what remains afterwards. Unfamiliar terms are explained right where they appear, so there are no terms you need to know in advance.
Getting Blocked and Bursting
The very first thing we sort out in the emergency room is whether it is blocked or burst.
A cerebral infarction is a stroke where an artery going to the brain is blocked, and the brain that received blood from that artery dies because it does not get oxygen. It is like a water pipe getting blocked, cutting off water only to the houses hooked up to that pipe. This side is overwhelmingly common, making up over 80% of all strokes (PMID 25323674).
A cerebral hemorrhage is a stroke where a blood vessel inside the brain bursts, and blood leaks out between brain tissue. This is the side where a pipe bursts and water spills inside the house. Bleeding where blood pools directly inside brain tissue makes up 10 to 15% of all strokes (PMID 19115172). Even adding these two numbers does not equal 100. That is because there are other types of bleeding in different locations, such as bleeding that pools between the membranes wrapping the brain.
The thing that blocks is usually a clump of clotted blood, and there are two ways it forms. A thrombus is a clump formed when flowing blood clots right in that spot. An embolus is a clump created elsewhere that floated down a blood vessel and got caught in a narrow place. It is like a branch falling from upstream getting caught in a narrow bottleneck downstream and blocking the water path. Cerebral infarctions happen both from emboli and from thrombi formed right in that spot (PMID 38864227). The most common causes of cerebral infarction are disease of large arteries, emboli that floated down from the heart, and disease of very small blood vessels (PMID 38759664).
The causes are different on the bursting side. Based on a 2008 review, most cerebral hemorrhages are due to long-standing high blood pressure, and diseases where proteins build up in blood vessel walls or blood vessel malformations are also causes (PMID 19115172).
In bleeding, that blood continues to do harm even after it has leaked out. The pooled blood takes up space and pushes on the surroundings. The pressure inside the head goes up, the blood clot gets bigger, and components released as the blood breaks down act as toxins (PMID 41159140).
Going back to the blocked side, even if an artery is blocked, the brain that the artery supplied blood to does not all die at once. The middle of the zone where blood was cut off is already beyond saving, but the edges still hold out. The penumbra is surrounding tissue where function has stopped due to a shortage of blood but has not died yet, which can be revived. It has not yet been decided whether this tissue will live or die, and the damage spreads over time from the center outward (PMID 8173671). It has been confirmed through imaging that this kind of tissue remains until several hours after a stroke begins. Those several hours are the window when blood can be made to flow again (PMID 8173671).
The speed at which it spreads varies greatly from person to person. The speed at which the dead area grows differs greatly depending on the patient, the area of the brain, and time. Two things make that difference. One is how much roundabout blood comes in from neighboring blood vessels bypassing the blocked pipe, and the other is how well the brain withstands a shortage of blood (PMID 39545332). If the roundabout blood is ample, the penumbra can hold out longer (PMID 25323674).
The two-box picture itself of "the dead core and the salvageable periphery" is also being re-examined recently. A 2026 review views this picture as merely a useful simplification, with actual damage proceeding in multiple continuous stages (PMID 42100815). This means the judgment of drawing a hard line that says "this place is already too late" is less solid than thought.

The reason we sort the two types first is that treatment goes in opposite directions. Treatment for the blocked side goes toward getting rid of what blocked it to make blood flow again. The trained side goes toward making sure blood leaks no more. The time right after a stroke happens is called the acute phase, and the mainstay of acute-phase treatment for the burst side is reversing the effect right away if the person was taking a drug that makes blood less likely to clot and lowering blood pressure (PMID 38759664).
A stroke is either blocked or burst, and because the treatment for the two goes in opposite directions, figuring out which one it is comes right at the front.
Where It Is Damaged Determines the Symptoms
It is the same stroke, yet one person cannot lift an arm, another cannot speak, and another has both. Location makes the difference.
The cerebral cortex is the thin outer layer covering the brain, spread with regions that divide up movement, speech, and sensation. Arteries also have designated regions they supply with blood branch by branch (PMID 32435049). Therefore, which vessel is blocked determines which function stops.
The middle cerebral artery is a large artery that sends blood to the lateral surface of the cerebrum and deep inside it. Because it is a large pipe supplying water to an entire neighborhood, when it blocks, an unusually large number of houses lose their water. The region this artery serves includes the area responsible for the movement of the opposite face and arm, and in the case of the left brain, it also includes the area responsible for speech.
There is a reason why movement frequently fails. The corticospinal tract is a nerve bundle that runs straight from the cortex responsible for movement down to the spinal cord. This bundle is the sole pathway through which commands to voluntarily move the muscles of the arms and legs travel straight down from the brain (PMID 33229733). Thus, when this bundle is injured, the movement commands issued by the brain cannot properly reach the arms and legs.
Hemiplegia is a condition where strength is lost in the arm and leg on one side of the body, or they do not move at all. It is one of the most common motor impairments after a stroke, mostly due to the signals exiting the injured motor area being cut off or disrupted (PMID 33229733).
The reason injuring the right brain causes the left arm and leg not to move is that this pathway crosses over to the opposite side as it descends. The main factor dividing recovery also lies within this pathway. It is how actively the motor cortex of the injured brain functions, and how intact the motor pathway crossing to the opposite side is. Fibers descending on the same side without crossing are observed during development, but whether they are used for recovery in adults is not yet clear (PMID 28691140).
Cases where speech collapses are different. Aphasia is a condition where the ability to produce or comprehend speech breaks down due to brain injury. The words one wants to say are in the head, but different words come out of the mouth, or spoken words sound like a foreign language. The circuits handling language are mostly biased toward the left brain. The mechanism of how speech returns is still under debate (PMID 38607432). The picture shown by imaging studies is this. In the early stages of recovery, especially in patients with a large extent of injury, the corresponding area in the opposite brain is mobilized. In the long run, how much the left language circuit recovers determines recovery (PMID 38607432).
Movements of the face and arm, and speech, are functions that easily collapse in a stroke this way. The tool that makes people memorize these signals is FAST, taken from the English acronyms Face, Arm, Speech, and Time (PMID 42258866, PMID 40862575). You check if one side of the face droops, if one arm drifts down when both arms are lifted, and if speech is slurred, and if even one applies, without delaying time, you immediately notify 119. A version adding two items to avoid missing balance and eye symptoms has also been proposed (PMID 40862575). That person at the dinner table matches all the first three items of FAST.
The accuracy of such tools is measured by two values. Sensitivity is the proportion of actual stroke patients that the tool screens out as having a stroke, and specificity is the proportion of non-stroke people correctly identified as not having one. Gathering 33 studies, screening tools including FAST had good sensitivity of 79 to 95%, but specificity fluctuated widely from 52 to 84% (PMID 42258866). In another review gathering only paramedic settings, FAST's sensitivity was scattered more widely from 64 to 97%, and specificity from 13 to 76.9%. The version adding two items lacked sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion (PMID 40862575).
This means that while it catches the real cases well, false alarms are mixed in, and there are cases that are missed. This tool is designed to quickly decide whether to go to the hospital. The same review summarizes that when a stroke is recognized early and patients are sent to the hospital quickly, the mortality rate is about 8 to 12% lower, and the proportion of living without others' help is 10 to 15% higher (PMID 42258866).

Determining whether it is a blockage or a rupture is imaging. It cannot be told apart by symptoms alone. First, CT or MRI rules out bleeding and other diseases resembling a stroke. Then, the dead core, penumbra, and blocked site are checked (PMID 25323674, PMID 38759664).
There is one more case that is easy to confuse. Transient ischemic attack is a case where symptoms identical to a stroke appear and then resolve on their own before brain tissue dies. Even if the symptoms resolve, it is treated as an alarm. This is because it is estimated that 7.5 to 17.4% of people who experience this suffer a stroke within 3 months afterward (PMID 33724327).
What is lost is determined by which vessel is blocked and which region is injured, FAST determines whether to go to the hospital, and imaging determines what kind of disease it is.
What Is Done — Time and Relearning
If that person at the dinner table is on the blocked side, what the hospital does is remove the blockage, and there are two methods.
Thrombolysis is a treatment that injects medicine into a vein to dissolve the clot that blocked the blood vessel. It is the approach of pouring clearing medicine into a blocked tube. Administering it within 4.5 hours after symptoms begin reduces disability. In some patients whose imaging confirms tissue that can still be saved, there was a benefit up to 9 hours, and the same was true for patients who woke up and discovered symptoms (PMID 31601801).
Expressed in numbers, it looks like this. When patients with symptoms severe enough to interfere with daily life arrived at the hospital and received this medicine within 3 hours, the proportion with little to no remaining disability was 39%. The group that received a fake medicine with no active ingredient (placebo) was 26%. In the 3-to-4.5-hour window, it was 35.3% versus 30.1%, meaning the later it is given, the smaller the difference between the two sides. Although the time in these figures was measured from hospital arrival, the same review concludes by counting treatment time from when symptoms started (PMID 33724327).
Thrombectomy is a procedure that pushes a thin tube into a blood vessel to directly retrieve the clot that blocked the brain. It is used when a large blood vessel is blocked. In an analysis pooling patients with a large blood vessel blocking blood supply to the front of the brain, the side that received this procedure had significantly less disability at 90 days. Statistically significant means the difference was large enough that it is hard to explain by chance alone. A calculation also showed that for every 2.6 patients treated, one of them had their disability lessened by one grade. There was no significant difference between the two sides in 90-day mortality and the risk of brain hemorrhage (PMID 26898852).

Here, time is visible in numbers. This is the result of dividing the data of 1,287 patients—the same ones from the previous analysis—by onset time. The odds are the probability of an event happening divided by the probability of it not happening. The odds that the side receiving this procedure would leave less disability at 90 days, compared to the side that did not, were 2.79 times higher when started at 3 hours from symptom onset, 1.98 times at 6 hours, and 1.57 times at 8 hours. The statistically significant benefit extended up to 7 hours and 18 minutes (PMID 27673305). For every hour of delay, the benefit drops noticeably.
Meanwhile, the span of time in which treatment can be started—in other words, the time window—has widened over the past decade. In patients selected by imaging, the time window for this procedure has stretched up to 24 hours after symptom onset (PMID 38759664, PMID 31601801). There is an analysis pooling 505 patients with a blocked large blood vessel supplying blood to the front of the brain. All of these are patients assigned to the trial more than 6 hours after they were last confirmed to be normal. The side that received the procedure had an independent daily living rate at 90 days of 45.9%, higher than the 19.3% of the side that did not. There was no significant difference between the two sides in brain hemorrhage causing symptoms and 90-day mortality (PMID 34774198).
However, the people enrolled in those trials are patients judged by imaging to still have salvageable tissue remaining (PMID 34774198). Therefore, the two results do not contradict each other. While there are people who benefit even late, that is a subset selected by imaging. Looking at all patients with a large blood vessel blockage overall, starting earlier left less disability (PMID 27673305).
Which treatment is given to which patient is recommended by the 2026 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines based on imaging and patient condition. These guidelines also cover the management of problems that follow in the acute phase, and swallowing problems are included among them (PMID 41582814).
The story is less clear on the ruptured side. Several clinical trials have sought the optimal treatment for brain hemorrhage, but none significantly improved outcomes or survival. As imaging, acute phase management, and surgical techniques have improved, the proportion of lives lost has dropped, but function after survival has hardly improved (PMID 41159140). There is a summary that bundle care—reversing the effect of blood-thinning drugs in the acute phase, lowering blood pressure, and managing according to established protocols in a stroke unit—improves outcomes (PMID 38759664).
Once the acute phase passes, the question changes. It moves from the problem of opening a blockage to the problem of living again with the remaining brain. In the US, about 800,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke each year, and up to half of them do not fully return to living without help afterward (PMID 37039412). The shape that recovery takes also varies by patient and by stage of recovery (PMID 37548025).
Stroke rehabilitation is learning. Motor rehabilitation operates on a mechanism where you improve as much as you practice and use. Patients learn how to reuse their motor, sensory, and cognitive functions through targeted training that is repeated in appropriate amounts, goal-oriented, and progressively difficult (PMID 37548025). Here, "appropriate amounts" refers to the amount of practice, in other words, rehabilitation dose.
There is a property of the brain that makes that learning possible. Neuroplasticity is the ability of the brain to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections. This property works in both directions. In a positive direction, it helps recover the original movement patterns. In a negative direction, it can cement temporary workarounds that accomplish tasks using alternative methods instead of the injured function, blocking the recovery of normal motor control. Most of this evidence comes from short- to medium-term studies (PMID 41967694).
Does rehabilitation work? A 2025 Cochrane review gathered 267 randomized trials comparing patients divided by a draw, totaling 21,838 people. Compared to receiving no rehabilitation, physical rehabilitation reported that it can improve daily living independence and motor function. The authors' conclusion is that physical rehabilitation combining multiple elements likely improves the recovery of function and mobility (PMID 39932103).
However, the certainty of evidence regarding daily living independence and motor function was low. Low certainty means that subsequent research has a strong room to change the conclusion. Results varied widely across studies, and 133 out of the 267 papers were conducted in a single country (PMID 39932103).
The starting point is still being sorted out. One rehabilitation review notes that getting patients up and moving should not begin before 24 hours pass after a stroke, and adds that there are no detailed guidelines for beyond that point (PMID 37039412). Another review summarizing early rehabilitation also considers that high-intensity treatment within the first 24 hours can be harmful. The same review notes that while the best starting point is not yet established, evidence is accumulating that starting rehabilitation within the first 2 weeks is beneficial for at least some deficits (PMID 29116473).
Lastly, this is not a one-time event. One in every four strokes happens again to someone who has previously experienced a stroke. Reducing recurrence connects to managing risk factors that damage blood vessels, such as controlling high blood pressure, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, along with quitting smoking (PMID 26300647).
On the blocked side, the earlier the benefit, the greater it is; on the ruptured side, there are still few treatments to speak of; and rehabilitation after the acute phase is the work of relearning with the remaining brain.
Where Else to Look
This is the front hallway. Every door this article opened and passed has a dedicated article.
How blood travels the roads to the brain is covered in How the Heart Moves Blood — Four Chambers, Four Doors, Two Loops. Blood pressure, the largest risk factor, continues in What Blood Pressure Measures — Two Numbers, and an Answer That Changes With Where You Measure, and the process of bumps forming on artery walls in What Cholesterol Is and Why We Measure It — Four Lines on a Blood Test, and the Packages They Name. When the same thing happens on the road supplying blood to the heart, it is covered in What Coronary Artery Disease Is — The Road That Feeds the Heart, Narrowed and Blocked, and atrial fibrillation, one of the pathways for a clot to drift down from the heart, in What Atrial Fibrillation Is — The Upper Chambers That Lost the Beat, and the Blood That Pools There.
The passage noting that rehabilitation is relearning leads to How the Central Nervous System Recovers — A Primer on Neuroplasticity, and the passage noting that recovery trajectories differ from person to person leads to When Does Recovery Happen — What Time Did, and What Treatment Did. The question "how much comes back?" is handled in Does 70% of What Was Lost Come Back? — Stroke's "Proportional Recovery Rule" and the Illusion Statistics Built.
The passage about temporary workarounds locking in and blocking recovery leads to How Deep Is the Recovery — Between Compensation and True Recovery, the dose of rehabilitation to How Much Is Enough — An Introduction to Dose-Response in Rehabilitation, and acute swallowing problems to How Do We Know Swallowing Has Failed — An Introduction to Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.
Source Papers
- "Stroke." (2024) — PMID 38759664 — Lifetime risk and second leading cause of death worldwide, sudden neurological deficits, the 24-hour window for thrombectomy, and bundled care for intracerebral hemorrhage.
- "Cerebral Infarct Growth: Pathophysiology, Assessment, and Clinical Implications." (2025) — PMID 39545332 — Energy depletion when blood flow falls below the critical threshold, with infarct growth averaging 5.4 mL/h (with high variance).
- "Imaging of acute ischemic stroke." (2014) — PMID 25323674 — Over 80% are ischemic, an estimated 1.8 million neurons lost per minute without treatment, and CT/MRI used first to rule out hemorrhage and stroke mimics.
- "Intracerebral hemorrhage." (2008) — PMID 19115172 — Intracerebral hemorrhage accounts for 10 to 15% of all strokes, mostly caused by chronic hypertension, along with the toxicity of blood and iron.
- "Hemodynamic Stroke: Emerging Concepts, Risk Estimation, and Treatment." (2024) — PMID 38864227 — Ischemic stroke is caused both by clots that travel and lodge, and by local thrombus formation.
- "Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Advances, Knowledge Gaps, Future Directions." (2025) — PMID 41159140 — Mass effect, hematoma expansion, and the toxicity of blood breakdown products; case fatality rates have dropped, but functional outcomes have not improved.
- "The ischemic penumbra." (1994) — PMID 8173671 — Tissue that is still alive and uncertain whether it will infarct or recover, representing a dynamic process spreading outward from the core.
- "Redefining the Cerebral Ischemic Core-Penumbra-Oligemia Continuum." (2026) — PMID 42100815 — The core-penumbra dichotomy is merely a simplification, and its deterministic assumptions are being challenged.
- "[Cerebral deep vascular architectures and subcortical infarcts]." (2020) — PMID 32435049 — Organizes brain structures by zones based on the arterial branches that supply them.
- "Axonal remodeling of the corticospinal tract during recovery after stroke." (2021) — PMID 33229733 — Hemiplegia is mainly driven by the loss of signals from the damaged motor cortex, and the corticospinal tract is the only direct descending motor pathway.
- "Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery." (2017) — PMID 28691140 — The integrity of crossed corticospinal tract fibers is a major determining factor for motor recovery after brain injury.
- "Language-related brain regions and white matter tracts in network plasticity of post-stroke aphasia." (2024) — PMID 38607432 — Mechanisms of language recovery remain debated, and recovery in the chronic phase relies on restoring left-lateralized language networks.
- "Early Recognition and Referral of Acute Stroke in Emergency Care." (2026) — PMID 42258866 — Covering 33 studies, the combined sensitivity of cognitive tools such as FAST is 79 to 95% with a specificity of 52 to 84%, and early recognition and referral reduce mortality by about 8 to 12% while increasing functional independence by 10 to 15%.
- "BE-FAST vs FAST in prehospital stroke recognition: a systematic review." (2025) — PMID 40862575 — FAST sensitivity is 64 to 97% with a specificity of 13 to 76.9%, while conclusions on BE-FAST, which adds balance and vision checks, are withheld due to insufficient evidence.
- "Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack and Acute Ischemic Stroke." (2021) — PMID 33724327 — 7.5 to 17.4% of TIA patients have a stroke within 3 months, and alteplase administered within 3 hours of hospital arrival shows a rate of 39% versus 26% (with the conclusion based on 4.5 hours from symptom onset).
- "Ischaemic stroke." (2019) — PMID 31601801 — Intravenous thrombolysis reduces disability within 4.5 hours or up to 9 hours with imaging selection, while thrombectomy extends to 24 hours with imaging selection.
- "Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: an IPD meta-analysis of five trials." (2016) — PMID 26898852 — Five trials including 1,287 patients, adjusted common odds ratio of 2.49, NNT of 2.6, with no difference between groups in death or hemorrhage.
- "Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke." (2016) — PMID 27673305 — In the same 1,287 patients, odds ratios were 2.79 at 3 hours, 1.98 at 6 hours, and 1.57 at 8 hours, remaining significant up to 7 hours and 18 minutes.
- "Thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke beyond 6 h from last known well (AURORA)." (2022) — PMID 34774198 — 505 patients between 6 and 24 hours, 45.9% independent versus 19.3%, in patients evaluated as having salvageable tissue.
- "2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke." (2026) — PMID 41582814 — Recommendations spanning prehospital assessment, acute treatment, and complication management (including swallowing), along with clearly stated knowledge gaps.
- "Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery." (2023) — PMID 37039412 — Out of roughly 800,000 annual patients in the U.S., up to 50% do not achieve full independence, and out-of-bed mobilization before 24 hours must be avoided.
- "Motor rehabilitation after stroke: ESO consensus-based definition and guiding framework." (2023) — PMID 37548025 — Motor rehabilitation operates through learning and use-dependent mechanisms, and recovery trajectories vary by patient and stage.
- "Neuroplasticity after stroke: adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms in rehabilitation." (2026) — PMID 41967694 — Adaptive plasticity leads to the recovery of original movement patterns, whereas maladaptive plasticity reinforces compensatory strategies; early, intensive, and task-specific interventions promote recovery, though evidence is mostly short- to medium-term.
- "Physical rehabilitation approaches for recovery of function and mobility after stroke." (2025) — PMID 39932103 — Cochrane review of 267 studies and 21,838 participants, with the authors concluding it "likely improves" walking speed (moderate certainty), while certainty for independence and motor function is low, and 133 of the 267 studies are from China.
- "Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review." (2017) — PMID 29116473 — The optimal starting time remains undetermined, high-intensity treatment within the first 24 hours may be harmful, but evidence is accumulating that starting within the first 2 weeks is beneficial for at least some deficits.
- "Secondary stroke prevention: challenges and solutions." (2015) — PMID 26300647 — One in four strokes recurs, and the main goal for risk reduction is managing vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking cessation.
Sources (26)
- StrokePMID 38759664
- Cerebral Infarct Growth: Pathophysiology, Assessment, and Clinical ImplicationsPMID 39545332
- Imaging of acute ischemic strokePMID 25323674
- Intracerebral hemorrhagePMID 19115172
- Hemodynamic Stroke: Emerging Concepts, Risk Estimation, and TreatmentPMID 38864227
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Advances, Knowledge Gaps, Future DirectionsPMID 41159140
- The ischemic penumbraPMID 8173671
- Redefining the Cerebral Ischemic Core-Penumbra-Oligemia ContinuumPMID 42100815
- [Cerebral deep vascular architectures and subcortical infarcts]PMID 32435049
- Axonal remodeling of the corticospinal tract during recovery after strokePMID 33229733
- Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor RecoveryPMID 28691140
- Language-related brain regions and white matter tracts in network plasticity of post-stroke aphasiaPMID 38607432
- Early Recognition and Referral of Acute Stroke in Emergency CarePMID 42258866
- BE-FAST vs FAST in prehospital stroke recognition: a systematic reviewPMID 40862575
- Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack and Acute Ischemic StrokePMID 33724327
- Ischaemic strokePMID 31601801
- Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: an IPD meta-analysis of five trialsPMID 26898852
- Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic StrokePMID 27673305
- Thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke beyond 6 h from last known well (AURORA)PMID 34774198
- 2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic StrokePMID 41582814
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor RecoveryPMID 37039412
- Motor rehabilitation after stroke: ESO consensus-based definition and guiding frameworkPMID 37548025
- Neuroplasticity after stroke: adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms in rehabilitationPMID 41967694
- Physical rehabilitation approaches for recovery of function and mobility after strokePMID 39932103
- Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative ReviewPMID 29116473
- Secondary stroke prevention: challenges and solutionsPMID 26300647