Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Nondiabetic Participants: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Shah Viral N, DuBose Stephanie N, Li Zoey, Beck Roy W, Peters Anne L, Weinstock Ruth S, Kruger Davida, Tansey Michael, Sparling David, Woerner Stephanie, Vendrame Francesco, Bergenstal Richard, Tamborlane William V, Watson Sara E, Sherr Jennifer

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019 · PMID 31127824 · 인용 315

PubMed ↗DOI ↗

CONTEXT: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasing for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. Although data on glycemic profiles of healthy, nondiabetic individuals exist for older sensors, assessment of glycemic metrics with new-generation CGM devices is lacking.

OBJECTIVE: To establish reference sensor glucose ranges in healthy, nondiabetic individuals across different age groups using a current generation CGM sensor.

DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective study.

SETTING: Twelve centers within the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. PATIENTS OR

PARTICIPANTS: Nonpregnant, healthy, nondiabetic children and adults (age ≥6 years) with nonobese body mass index.

INTERVENTION: Each participant wore a blinded Dexcom G6 CGM, with once-daily calibration, for up to 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CGM metrics of mean glucose, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability.

RESULTS: A total of 153 participants (age 7 to 80 years) were included in the analyses. Mean average glucose was 98 to 99 mg/dL (5.4 to 5.5 mmol/L) for all age groups except those over 60 years, in whom mean average glucose was 104 mg/dL (5.8 mmol/L). The median time between 70 to 140 mg/dL (3.9 to 7.8 mmol/L) was 96% (interquartile range, 93 to 98). Mean within-individual coefficient of variation was 17 ± 3%. Median time spent with glucose levels >140 mg/dL was 2.1% (30 min/d), and median time spent with glucose levels <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) was 1.1% (15 min/d).

CONCLUSION: By assessing across age groups in a healthy, nondiabetic population, normative sensor glucose data have been derived and will be useful as a benchmark for future research studies.

📄 이 논문을 인용한 Paperis 글

이 논문이 근거 목록에 올라 있는 Paperis 글입니다.